In an exclusive interview, we explore the remarkable case of Richard Glossip, an Oklahoma death row inmate who has spent nearly 27 years behind bars. Glossip has faced the grim prospect of execution nine times, enduring three last meals and two thorough investigations that have cast serious doubts on his conviction. Despite this overwhelming threat, he has persistently fought for his life, recently garnering significant support from unexpected allies, including the Republican state attorney general, Gentner F. Drummond, who is advocating for the overturning of Glossip’s 1997 conviction.

At 61 years old, Glossip was convicted of allegedly hiring James Snead to murder Barry Van Treese, the owner of a motel in Oklahoma City. Snead, who received a life sentence, testified against Glossip, claiming he was paid $10,000 for the hit. Throughout the years, Glossip has steadfastly maintained his innocence.

Drummond, while expressing some skepticism about Glossip’s innocence, has acknowledged the fundamental flaws in the initial prosecution—a rare admission for someone in his position. He pointed out significant issues during the trial, such as the fact that Snead’s testimony was influenced by emotional stabilization medications and that crucial evidence, including motel receipts and a bathrobe that could help exonerate Glossip, was destroyed.

Amid the turmoil surrounding his case, Glossip has remained active; he has been married twice while incarcerated. His resilience is evident as he awaits a new hearing scheduled for this month, with the U.S. Supreme Court set to consider his appeal on January 22nd.

Drummond’s push for a reevaluation of Glossip’s case has attracted support from nearly 20 current and former state and federal prosecutors, forming an unusual coalition advocating for justice. Robin Maher, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, commented on the broader implications of Glossip’s situation, highlighting a troubling reality: the current capital punishment system is failing to deliver fair and just outcomes.

Richard Glossip’s case continues to develop, with advocates rallying for justice in light of what many view as an unjust system. As the Supreme Court gears up to hear arguments, the future of Glossip—as well as the larger implications for capital punishment in America—hangs in the balance.